Interactionism Read Anew: A Proposal Concerning Phenomenal Judgments
نویسنده
چکیده
From a classical Cartesian perspective, interactionism implies the transfer of thoughts and feelings from a non-physical phenomenal consciousness to the physical brain. Thereby, phenomenal consciousness is thought to control the physical body somehow like a marionette hanging by strings of non-physical thought. Differing from this depiction, a basic premise of the current interactionist hypothesis is that the non-physical phenomenal consciousness reflexively effects accentuation of thoughts, feelings and sensory experiences which already exist as physical brain processes. In this essay, the mentioned interactionist hypothesis is presented and central philosophical problems which pertain to it are discussed. Conclusively, the hypothesis may withstand the initial scrutiny and is thereby rendered coherent. Nonetheless, the feasibility of interactionism is not thereby significantly influenced. That would require a much more extensive treatment of the feasibility of the current hypothesis as well as of coherent solutions to numerous other problems pertaining to interactionism.
منابع مشابه
Experimental Methods for Unraveling the Mind–Body Problem: The Phenomenal Judgment Approach
A rigorous approach to the study of the mind–body problem is suggested. Since humans are able to talk about consciousness (produce phenomenal judgments), it is argued that the study of neural mechanisms of phenomenal judgments can solve the hard problem of consciousness. Particular methods are suggested for: (1) verification and falsification of materialism; (2) verification and falsification o...
متن کاملAttitudes of Judgment and the Size-distance Invariance Hypothesis *
Judgments of the size and distance of standards which were 10, 20, 30, 60, or 120 ft. from O were obtained with the phenomenal, objective, perspective, and projective attitudes. Different Os were assigned to each of 20 combinations of standard distance and attitude. The main purposes of the study were: (a) to verify Carlson's (1962) results concerning the effects of attitude on size judgment; a...
متن کاملA Concrete Proposal for an Automatically Refereed Scholarly Electronic Journal
A new kind of a not refereed electronic scholarly journal is proposed Each paper is immediately published after its submission but it is latter judged by the readers of the journal leading to a dynamically updated score that measures the quality of the paper The author of the paper has a score too that is a ected by the score assumed by his paper s Also the readers have a score measuring the qu...
متن کاملPhenomenal Concepts and the Problem of Acquaintance
Some contemporary discussion about the explanation of consciousness substantially recapitulates a decisive debate about reference, knowledge, and justification from an earlier stage of the analytic tradition. In particular, I argue that proponents of a recently popular strategy for accounting for an explanatory gap between physical and phenomenal facts — the so-called ‘phenomenal concept strate...
متن کاملThe irrelevance of folk intuitions to the "hard problem" of consciousness.
Recently, a number of philosophers have turned to folk intuitions about mental states for data about qualia and phenomenal consciousness. In this paper I argue that current research along these lines does not tell us about these subjects. I focus on a series of studies, performed by Justin Sytsma and Edouard Machery, to make my argument. Folk judgments studied by these researchers are mostly li...
متن کامل